Some daily stand-ups (or daily scrums), aren't like this. They are monotonous, manager-led and pointless to the attendees. Teams here lack any sense of commitment or ownership and they eventually question the merit of the practice and perhaps even abandon it. Unfortunately, abandoning the stand-up doesn't improve their chances of building commitment or ownership, which are principles of Scrum. So I've compiled a list of pointers on ways to improve the daily stand-up meeting and improve commitment and ownership.
The stand-up is for the team. This meeting is for the team to synchronize their efforts towards achieving their goal, not just as a status report. If their are any "management artifacts" that need to be created (such as an update to a tracking tool), it should be done outside the meeting.
Anti-Tip: A sprint's commitment is on quality, not quantity. If a studio wants a predictable amount of garbage, then taking over and running sprint meetings for the team is the best way to do it.
The rules aren't fixed. The "answer the three questions" rule you read about in books is only the starting place. Teams add questions, change the format, and do anything necessary to address their needs.
Anti-Tip: Make Scrum a process by fixing all the practices. This will ensure that continuous improvements will cease.
It's about the commitment to the goal, not just the tasks. Task tracking is critical, but work will arise on a daily basis that wasn't considered during sprint planning. Teams need to react to this new work and balance it daily against their goal. They need to inform each other about new developments and threats to their goal. They should care about accomplishing the tasks, but they should care about the goal more.
Anti-Tip: Force teams to use task tracking software. They'll measure success by completing tasks, not adding value.
The ScrumMaster must know their role. ScrumMasters do not run the daily stand-up. They facilitate them. The difference is that the rules for the stand-up come from the team and the ScrumMaster ensures that those rules are followed. If the team has decided that being late to the stand-up is not acceptable, they'll likely have a rule in place to chastise those who are late. Paying $1 or singing a song is common. ScrumMasters must not let them off the hook.
Anti-Tip: When you solve all of today's problems for the team, they'll expect you to solve tomorrow's problems as well.
Respect the time-box and start time. Some of the most effective stand-ups I've seen were five-minute "hurricanes of energy and activity". The team shared what they needed to share and went back to work. Stand-ups that take longer than 15 minutes are just wrong and need to be fixed. Also, don't waste time by having a variable start time (based on who shows up late).
Anti-Tip: Ignore the time-box and see who shows up on time (& vice-versa)
Prefer a physical task board. This is not always possible to have, but here is no electronic replacement that is equivalent. A physical task board with cards allows everyone on the team to handle the tasks simultaneously at the same location. It encourages team ownership.
... & Avoid projectors. This might seem a bit redundant given the last point, but projectors used in a stand-up meeting should be renamed "conversation killers". Projectors usually involve a software tool that provides information in a linear, one-at-a-time way with someone, unfortunately often the ScrumMaster, at the keyboard/mouse controls. If defeats the non-linear, swarming-on-the-goal, value of the stand-up. Software tools are often a critical part of project planning and tracking, but they have no place in a co-located daily stand-up.
Anti-Tip: Usually tools allow only one operator (mouse/keyboard). When there is one operator in the meeting, guess what happens to the engagement levels for everyone else?
Anti-Tip: Standing in a circle answering three questions is a secret formula which leads to the magical process fairy flying overhead, sprinkling productivity dust on people. These practices have nothing to do with team engagement through ownership.